Review




Structured Review

Biacore spr binding analysis
( A ) CF647-labeled ImmTAAI molecules were assessed for pHLA binding and compared to unlabeled molecules by <t>SPR</t> <t>using</t> <t>BIAcore</t> 8K. Binding to PPI or Tel cognate pHLA was carried out at 37°C. ( B ) Similarly, CF647-labeled ImmTAAI molecules were assessed for PD-1 binding and compared to unlabeled molecules. PD-1 binding was carried out at 25°C. ( C ) Schematic of the ECN90 beta cell line: Jurkat NFL Mel5 PD-1 reporter assay. ( D ) ECN90 or NCI-H1703 cells were pulsed with Melan-A–activating peptide, and titrations of unlabeled or labeled PPI ImmTAAI molecules were added.
Spr Binding Analysis, supplied by Biacore, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/spr binding analysis/product/Biacore
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
spr binding analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars

Images

1) Product Images from "Beta cell–targeted PD-1 agonist inhibits cell-mediated autoimmunity in pancreas tissue slices"

Article Title: Beta cell–targeted PD-1 agonist inhibits cell-mediated autoimmunity in pancreas tissue slices

Journal: Science Advances

doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aec9029

( A ) CF647-labeled ImmTAAI molecules were assessed for pHLA binding and compared to unlabeled molecules by SPR using BIAcore 8K. Binding to PPI or Tel cognate pHLA was carried out at 37°C. ( B ) Similarly, CF647-labeled ImmTAAI molecules were assessed for PD-1 binding and compared to unlabeled molecules. PD-1 binding was carried out at 25°C. ( C ) Schematic of the ECN90 beta cell line: Jurkat NFL Mel5 PD-1 reporter assay. ( D ) ECN90 or NCI-H1703 cells were pulsed with Melan-A–activating peptide, and titrations of unlabeled or labeled PPI ImmTAAI molecules were added.
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) CF647-labeled ImmTAAI molecules were assessed for pHLA binding and compared to unlabeled molecules by SPR using BIAcore 8K. Binding to PPI or Tel cognate pHLA was carried out at 37°C. ( B ) Similarly, CF647-labeled ImmTAAI molecules were assessed for PD-1 binding and compared to unlabeled molecules. PD-1 binding was carried out at 25°C. ( C ) Schematic of the ECN90 beta cell line: Jurkat NFL Mel5 PD-1 reporter assay. ( D ) ECN90 or NCI-H1703 cells were pulsed with Melan-A–activating peptide, and titrations of unlabeled or labeled PPI ImmTAAI molecules were added.

Techniques Used: Labeling, Binding Assay, Reporter Assay



Similar Products

86
Biacore spr binding analysis
( A ) CF647-labeled ImmTAAI molecules were assessed for pHLA binding and compared to unlabeled molecules by <t>SPR</t> <t>using</t> <t>BIAcore</t> 8K. Binding to PPI or Tel cognate pHLA was carried out at 37°C. ( B ) Similarly, CF647-labeled ImmTAAI molecules were assessed for PD-1 binding and compared to unlabeled molecules. PD-1 binding was carried out at 25°C. ( C ) Schematic of the ECN90 beta cell line: Jurkat NFL Mel5 PD-1 reporter assay. ( D ) ECN90 or NCI-H1703 cells were pulsed with Melan-A–activating peptide, and titrations of unlabeled or labeled PPI ImmTAAI molecules were added.
Spr Binding Analysis, supplied by Biacore, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/spr binding analysis/product/Biacore
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
spr binding analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Biacore surface plasmon resonance spr binding analysis
( A ) CF647-labeled ImmTAAI molecules were assessed for pHLA binding and compared to unlabeled molecules by <t>SPR</t> <t>using</t> <t>BIAcore</t> 8K. Binding to PPI or Tel cognate pHLA was carried out at 37°C. ( B ) Similarly, CF647-labeled ImmTAAI molecules were assessed for PD-1 binding and compared to unlabeled molecules. PD-1 binding was carried out at 25°C. ( C ) Schematic of the ECN90 beta cell line: Jurkat NFL Mel5 PD-1 reporter assay. ( D ) ECN90 or NCI-H1703 cells were pulsed with Melan-A–activating peptide, and titrations of unlabeled or labeled PPI ImmTAAI molecules were added.
Surface Plasmon Resonance Spr Binding Analysis, supplied by Biacore, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/surface plasmon resonance spr binding analysis/product/Biacore
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
surface plasmon resonance spr binding analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Danaher Inc surface plasmon resonance (spr) binding analysis
( A ) CF647-labeled ImmTAAI molecules were assessed for pHLA binding and compared to unlabeled molecules by <t>SPR</t> <t>using</t> <t>BIAcore</t> 8K. Binding to PPI or Tel cognate pHLA was carried out at 37°C. ( B ) Similarly, CF647-labeled ImmTAAI molecules were assessed for PD-1 binding and compared to unlabeled molecules. PD-1 binding was carried out at 25°C. ( C ) Schematic of the ECN90 beta cell line: Jurkat NFL Mel5 PD-1 reporter assay. ( D ) ECN90 or NCI-H1703 cells were pulsed with Melan-A–activating peptide, and titrations of unlabeled or labeled PPI ImmTAAI molecules were added.
Surface Plasmon Resonance (Spr) Binding Analysis, supplied by Danaher Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/surface plasmon resonance (spr) binding analysis/product/Danaher Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
surface plasmon resonance (spr) binding analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Carterra Inc systemht-spr binding analysis
( A ) CF647-labeled ImmTAAI molecules were assessed for pHLA binding and compared to unlabeled molecules by <t>SPR</t> <t>using</t> <t>BIAcore</t> 8K. Binding to PPI or Tel cognate pHLA was carried out at 37°C. ( B ) Similarly, CF647-labeled ImmTAAI molecules were assessed for PD-1 binding and compared to unlabeled molecules. PD-1 binding was carried out at 25°C. ( C ) Schematic of the ECN90 beta cell line: Jurkat NFL Mel5 PD-1 reporter assay. ( D ) ECN90 or NCI-H1703 cells were pulsed with Melan-A–activating peptide, and titrations of unlabeled or labeled PPI ImmTAAI molecules were added.
Systemht Spr Binding Analysis, supplied by Carterra Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/systemht-spr binding analysis/product/Carterra Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
systemht-spr binding analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Danaher Inc spr-based relative binding activity analysis
( A ) CF647-labeled ImmTAAI molecules were assessed for pHLA binding and compared to unlabeled molecules by <t>SPR</t> <t>using</t> <t>BIAcore</t> 8K. Binding to PPI or Tel cognate pHLA was carried out at 37°C. ( B ) Similarly, CF647-labeled ImmTAAI molecules were assessed for PD-1 binding and compared to unlabeled molecules. PD-1 binding was carried out at 25°C. ( C ) Schematic of the ECN90 beta cell line: Jurkat NFL Mel5 PD-1 reporter assay. ( D ) ECN90 or NCI-H1703 cells were pulsed with Melan-A–activating peptide, and titrations of unlabeled or labeled PPI ImmTAAI molecules were added.
Spr Based Relative Binding Activity Analysis, supplied by Danaher Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/spr-based relative binding activity analysis/product/Danaher Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
spr-based relative binding activity analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Biacore binding kinetics analysis for biacore t200 (spr)
( A ) CF647-labeled ImmTAAI molecules were assessed for pHLA binding and compared to unlabeled molecules by <t>SPR</t> <t>using</t> <t>BIAcore</t> 8K. Binding to PPI or Tel cognate pHLA was carried out at 37°C. ( B ) Similarly, CF647-labeled ImmTAAI molecules were assessed for PD-1 binding and compared to unlabeled molecules. PD-1 binding was carried out at 25°C. ( C ) Schematic of the ECN90 beta cell line: Jurkat NFL Mel5 PD-1 reporter assay. ( D ) ECN90 or NCI-H1703 cells were pulsed with Melan-A–activating peptide, and titrations of unlabeled or labeled PPI ImmTAAI molecules were added.
Binding Kinetics Analysis For Biacore T200 (Spr), supplied by Biacore, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/binding kinetics analysis for biacore t200 (spr)/product/Biacore
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
binding kinetics analysis for biacore t200 (spr) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
CH Instruments spr binding analysis
a Sequence analysis of the PR motif in multiple species of GPR54 CT. b SH3 domain protein-binding array using the TranSignal™ SH3 Domain Array kit. The principal Src binding region is circled in red evident (1 Src; 2 the dilution of Src in half). c <t>SPR</t> binding-affinity measurement of Src and GPR54 CT. Src and GPR54 CT binding affinity is 2.6 nM (kinetic <t>analysis,</t> <t>RUmax</t> = 36.31, Chi = 1.08). d Crystallization structure analysis of the SH2-SH3 domain of Src and the human GPR54 336–356 piptide including PR motif. GPR54 CT bound with the SH3 domain of Src mainly via the key residues including R336, P339 and P342. e – h IB analysis of total samples and GST pull-downs using GST proteins including GST, GST-GPR54 CT, GST-GPR54 CT m1 (R336A&P339A), GST-GPR54 CT m2 (delta 339–344) incubated separately with WCL of 293 T cells transfected with HA-Src ( e ) and quantification of protein levels ( f ), IB analysis of WCL and anti-GPR54 IP assays derived from RAW264.7 cells induced by Kp-10 for 20 min ( g ) and quantification of protein levels ( h ). i , j IF staining was carried out using pre-osteoclasts differentiated from BMMs with M-CSF (10 ng/ml) and RANKL (50 ng/ml) stimulation for 2 days, then treated with 10 nM Kp-10 for 20 min. Representative images of endogenous Gpr54 and Src were shown by total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy ( i ), and the Mander’s overlap coefficient (MOC) as a measure of colocalization in cells from multiple images taken randomly ( j ). Scale bar, 50 μm. Data represent means ± SEM. P values were determined by one-way ANOVA analysis ( f , h ) or two-tailed Student’s t -test ( j ). Representative results were obtained from at least three independent experiments. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Spr Binding Analysis, supplied by CH Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/spr binding analysis/product/CH Instruments
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
spr binding analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Danaher Inc spr analysis of monobody proteins binding to gstegfp
a Sequence analysis of the PR motif in multiple species of GPR54 CT. b SH3 domain protein-binding array using the TranSignal™ SH3 Domain Array kit. The principal Src binding region is circled in red evident (1 Src; 2 the dilution of Src in half). c <t>SPR</t> binding-affinity measurement of Src and GPR54 CT. Src and GPR54 CT binding affinity is 2.6 nM (kinetic <t>analysis,</t> <t>RUmax</t> = 36.31, Chi = 1.08). d Crystallization structure analysis of the SH2-SH3 domain of Src and the human GPR54 336–356 piptide including PR motif. GPR54 CT bound with the SH3 domain of Src mainly via the key residues including R336, P339 and P342. e – h IB analysis of total samples and GST pull-downs using GST proteins including GST, GST-GPR54 CT, GST-GPR54 CT m1 (R336A&P339A), GST-GPR54 CT m2 (delta 339–344) incubated separately with WCL of 293 T cells transfected with HA-Src ( e ) and quantification of protein levels ( f ), IB analysis of WCL and anti-GPR54 IP assays derived from RAW264.7 cells induced by Kp-10 for 20 min ( g ) and quantification of protein levels ( h ). i , j IF staining was carried out using pre-osteoclasts differentiated from BMMs with M-CSF (10 ng/ml) and RANKL (50 ng/ml) stimulation for 2 days, then treated with 10 nM Kp-10 for 20 min. Representative images of endogenous Gpr54 and Src were shown by total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy ( i ), and the Mander’s overlap coefficient (MOC) as a measure of colocalization in cells from multiple images taken randomly ( j ). Scale bar, 50 μm. Data represent means ± SEM. P values were determined by one-way ANOVA analysis ( f , h ) or two-tailed Student’s t -test ( j ). Representative results were obtained from at least three independent experiments. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Spr Analysis Of Monobody Proteins Binding To Gstegfp, supplied by Danaher Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/spr analysis of monobody proteins binding to gstegfp/product/Danaher Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
spr analysis of monobody proteins binding to gstegfp - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Danaher Inc spr spectroscopy-based binding analysis
a Sequence analysis of the PR motif in multiple species of GPR54 CT. b SH3 domain protein-binding array using the TranSignal™ SH3 Domain Array kit. The principal Src binding region is circled in red evident (1 Src; 2 the dilution of Src in half). c <t>SPR</t> binding-affinity measurement of Src and GPR54 CT. Src and GPR54 CT binding affinity is 2.6 nM (kinetic <t>analysis,</t> <t>RUmax</t> = 36.31, Chi = 1.08). d Crystallization structure analysis of the SH2-SH3 domain of Src and the human GPR54 336–356 piptide including PR motif. GPR54 CT bound with the SH3 domain of Src mainly via the key residues including R336, P339 and P342. e – h IB analysis of total samples and GST pull-downs using GST proteins including GST, GST-GPR54 CT, GST-GPR54 CT m1 (R336A&P339A), GST-GPR54 CT m2 (delta 339–344) incubated separately with WCL of 293 T cells transfected with HA-Src ( e ) and quantification of protein levels ( f ), IB analysis of WCL and anti-GPR54 IP assays derived from RAW264.7 cells induced by Kp-10 for 20 min ( g ) and quantification of protein levels ( h ). i , j IF staining was carried out using pre-osteoclasts differentiated from BMMs with M-CSF (10 ng/ml) and RANKL (50 ng/ml) stimulation for 2 days, then treated with 10 nM Kp-10 for 20 min. Representative images of endogenous Gpr54 and Src were shown by total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy ( i ), and the Mander’s overlap coefficient (MOC) as a measure of colocalization in cells from multiple images taken randomly ( j ). Scale bar, 50 μm. Data represent means ± SEM. P values were determined by one-way ANOVA analysis ( f , h ) or two-tailed Student’s t -test ( j ). Representative results were obtained from at least three independent experiments. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Spr Spectroscopy Based Binding Analysis, supplied by Danaher Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/spr spectroscopy-based binding analysis/product/Danaher Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
spr spectroscopy-based binding analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


( A ) CF647-labeled ImmTAAI molecules were assessed for pHLA binding and compared to unlabeled molecules by SPR using BIAcore 8K. Binding to PPI or Tel cognate pHLA was carried out at 37°C. ( B ) Similarly, CF647-labeled ImmTAAI molecules were assessed for PD-1 binding and compared to unlabeled molecules. PD-1 binding was carried out at 25°C. ( C ) Schematic of the ECN90 beta cell line: Jurkat NFL Mel5 PD-1 reporter assay. ( D ) ECN90 or NCI-H1703 cells were pulsed with Melan-A–activating peptide, and titrations of unlabeled or labeled PPI ImmTAAI molecules were added.

Journal: Science Advances

Article Title: Beta cell–targeted PD-1 agonist inhibits cell-mediated autoimmunity in pancreas tissue slices

doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aec9029

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) CF647-labeled ImmTAAI molecules were assessed for pHLA binding and compared to unlabeled molecules by SPR using BIAcore 8K. Binding to PPI or Tel cognate pHLA was carried out at 37°C. ( B ) Similarly, CF647-labeled ImmTAAI molecules were assessed for PD-1 binding and compared to unlabeled molecules. PD-1 binding was carried out at 25°C. ( C ) Schematic of the ECN90 beta cell line: Jurkat NFL Mel5 PD-1 reporter assay. ( D ) ECN90 or NCI-H1703 cells were pulsed with Melan-A–activating peptide, and titrations of unlabeled or labeled PPI ImmTAAI molecules were added.

Article Snippet: SPR binding analysis was performed using a BIAcore 8 K (GE Healthcare) as described previously ( ).

Techniques: Labeling, Binding Assay, Reporter Assay

a Sequence analysis of the PR motif in multiple species of GPR54 CT. b SH3 domain protein-binding array using the TranSignal™ SH3 Domain Array kit. The principal Src binding region is circled in red evident (1 Src; 2 the dilution of Src in half). c SPR binding-affinity measurement of Src and GPR54 CT. Src and GPR54 CT binding affinity is 2.6 nM (kinetic analysis, RUmax = 36.31, Chi = 1.08). d Crystallization structure analysis of the SH2-SH3 domain of Src and the human GPR54 336–356 piptide including PR motif. GPR54 CT bound with the SH3 domain of Src mainly via the key residues including R336, P339 and P342. e – h IB analysis of total samples and GST pull-downs using GST proteins including GST, GST-GPR54 CT, GST-GPR54 CT m1 (R336A&P339A), GST-GPR54 CT m2 (delta 339–344) incubated separately with WCL of 293 T cells transfected with HA-Src ( e ) and quantification of protein levels ( f ), IB analysis of WCL and anti-GPR54 IP assays derived from RAW264.7 cells induced by Kp-10 for 20 min ( g ) and quantification of protein levels ( h ). i , j IF staining was carried out using pre-osteoclasts differentiated from BMMs with M-CSF (10 ng/ml) and RANKL (50 ng/ml) stimulation for 2 days, then treated with 10 nM Kp-10 for 20 min. Representative images of endogenous Gpr54 and Src were shown by total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy ( i ), and the Mander’s overlap coefficient (MOC) as a measure of colocalization in cells from multiple images taken randomly ( j ). Scale bar, 50 μm. Data represent means ± SEM. P values were determined by one-way ANOVA analysis ( f , h ) or two-tailed Student’s t -test ( j ). Representative results were obtained from at least three independent experiments. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: Kisspeptin-10 binding to Gpr54 in osteoclasts prevents bone loss by activating Dusp18-mediated dephosphorylation of Src

doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-44852-9

Figure Lengend Snippet: a Sequence analysis of the PR motif in multiple species of GPR54 CT. b SH3 domain protein-binding array using the TranSignal™ SH3 Domain Array kit. The principal Src binding region is circled in red evident (1 Src; 2 the dilution of Src in half). c SPR binding-affinity measurement of Src and GPR54 CT. Src and GPR54 CT binding affinity is 2.6 nM (kinetic analysis, RUmax = 36.31, Chi = 1.08). d Crystallization structure analysis of the SH2-SH3 domain of Src and the human GPR54 336–356 piptide including PR motif. GPR54 CT bound with the SH3 domain of Src mainly via the key residues including R336, P339 and P342. e – h IB analysis of total samples and GST pull-downs using GST proteins including GST, GST-GPR54 CT, GST-GPR54 CT m1 (R336A&P339A), GST-GPR54 CT m2 (delta 339–344) incubated separately with WCL of 293 T cells transfected with HA-Src ( e ) and quantification of protein levels ( f ), IB analysis of WCL and anti-GPR54 IP assays derived from RAW264.7 cells induced by Kp-10 for 20 min ( g ) and quantification of protein levels ( h ). i , j IF staining was carried out using pre-osteoclasts differentiated from BMMs with M-CSF (10 ng/ml) and RANKL (50 ng/ml) stimulation for 2 days, then treated with 10 nM Kp-10 for 20 min. Representative images of endogenous Gpr54 and Src were shown by total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy ( i ), and the Mander’s overlap coefficient (MOC) as a measure of colocalization in cells from multiple images taken randomly ( j ). Scale bar, 50 μm. Data represent means ± SEM. P values were determined by one-way ANOVA analysis ( f , h ) or two-tailed Student’s t -test ( j ). Representative results were obtained from at least three independent experiments. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Article Snippet: Fig. 4 Src was dephosphorylated via DUSP18 following GPR54 activation by Kp-10. a The binding affinity of DUSP18 and Src was measured at 5.9 nM (RUmax = 130.6, Chi = 3.42) by SPR binding analysis. b – f IB and quantification of protein co-IP levels.

Techniques: Sequencing, Protein Binding, Binding Assay, Crystallization Assay, Incubation, Transfection, Derivative Assay, Staining, Fluorescence, Microscopy, Two Tailed Test

a – d Anti-Gpr54 IP was performed on WCL derived from RAW264.7 cells treated with indicated dose of Kp-10 for 20 min. Beads were analyzed by phosphatase activity assay ( a ), mass spectrometry assay ( b ), IB analysis ( c ) and quantification of protein levels ( d ). e , f Protein co-localization was analyzed by IF staining in primary pre-osteoclast with 10 nM Kp-10 treatment for 20 min. Representative images of endogenous Gpr54 and Dusp18 were shown by TIRF microscopy ( e ), and MOC was used to quantify the degree of colocalization in cells from multiple images taken randomly ( f ). Scale bar, 50 µm. g , h binding affinity was measured by SPR binding analysis. The binding affinity of DUSP18 and human GPR54 CT was measured at 40 nM, RUmax = 68.22, Chi = 1.01 ( g ), DUSP18 and mouse Gpr54 336–342 was measured at 1.8 µM, RUmax = 154.6, Chi = 3.42 ( h ). i – l IB and quantification of protein levels analysis of total samples and GST pull-downs using GST proteins including GST, GST-GPR54 CT, GST-GPR54 CT m1 (R336A&P339A), GST-GPR54 CT m2 (delta 339–344) incubated with WCL of 293 T cells transfected with DUSP18-HA ( i ) and quantification of protein levels ( j ), Total samples and GST pull-downs using His-SRC protein (0 or 0.1 μg) purified from Sf9 cells, His-DUSP18 (0, 0.1 or 0.2 μg), and GST proteins purified from E. coli ( k ) and quantification of protein levels ( l ). Data represent means ± SEM. P values were determined by one-way ANOVA analysis ( a , d , j , l ) or two-tailed Student’s t -test ( f ). Representative results were obtained from at least three independent experiments. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: Kisspeptin-10 binding to Gpr54 in osteoclasts prevents bone loss by activating Dusp18-mediated dephosphorylation of Src

doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-44852-9

Figure Lengend Snippet: a – d Anti-Gpr54 IP was performed on WCL derived from RAW264.7 cells treated with indicated dose of Kp-10 for 20 min. Beads were analyzed by phosphatase activity assay ( a ), mass spectrometry assay ( b ), IB analysis ( c ) and quantification of protein levels ( d ). e , f Protein co-localization was analyzed by IF staining in primary pre-osteoclast with 10 nM Kp-10 treatment for 20 min. Representative images of endogenous Gpr54 and Dusp18 were shown by TIRF microscopy ( e ), and MOC was used to quantify the degree of colocalization in cells from multiple images taken randomly ( f ). Scale bar, 50 µm. g , h binding affinity was measured by SPR binding analysis. The binding affinity of DUSP18 and human GPR54 CT was measured at 40 nM, RUmax = 68.22, Chi = 1.01 ( g ), DUSP18 and mouse Gpr54 336–342 was measured at 1.8 µM, RUmax = 154.6, Chi = 3.42 ( h ). i – l IB and quantification of protein levels analysis of total samples and GST pull-downs using GST proteins including GST, GST-GPR54 CT, GST-GPR54 CT m1 (R336A&P339A), GST-GPR54 CT m2 (delta 339–344) incubated with WCL of 293 T cells transfected with DUSP18-HA ( i ) and quantification of protein levels ( j ), Total samples and GST pull-downs using His-SRC protein (0 or 0.1 μg) purified from Sf9 cells, His-DUSP18 (0, 0.1 or 0.2 μg), and GST proteins purified from E. coli ( k ) and quantification of protein levels ( l ). Data represent means ± SEM. P values were determined by one-way ANOVA analysis ( a , d , j , l ) or two-tailed Student’s t -test ( f ). Representative results were obtained from at least three independent experiments. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Article Snippet: Fig. 4 Src was dephosphorylated via DUSP18 following GPR54 activation by Kp-10. a The binding affinity of DUSP18 and Src was measured at 5.9 nM (RUmax = 130.6, Chi = 3.42) by SPR binding analysis. b – f IB and quantification of protein co-IP levels.

Techniques: Derivative Assay, Phosphatase Assay, Mass Spectrometry, Staining, Microscopy, Binding Assay, Incubation, Transfection, Purification, Two Tailed Test

a The binding affinity of DUSP18 and Src was measured at 5.9 nM (RUmax = 130.6, Chi = 3.42) by SPR binding analysis. b – f IB and quantification of protein co-IP levels. Anti-Flag IP derived from 293 T cells transfected with HA-Src and either DUSP18-Flag or DUSP18 (C104S)-Flag constructs with or without Kp-10 treatment for 20 min were lysed and subjected to anti-FLAG IP ( b ). Phosphatase reaction products using His-DUSP18 and His-DUSP18 (C104S) proteins purified from E. coli and SRC proteins purified from Sf9 insect cells ( c ) and quantification of protein levels ( d ). Anti-Src IP derived from RAW264.7 cells treated with or without Kp-10 treatment for 20 min were lysed and subjected to anti-Src IP ( e ) and quantification of protein levels ( f ). g , h Src and Dusp18 co-localization was analyzed by IF staining in primary pre-osteoclasts treated with 10 nM Kp-10 treatment for 20 min. Representative images of endogenous Dusp18 and Src were shown by TIRF microscopy ( g ), and MOC was used to quantify the degree of colocalization in cells from multiple images taken randomly ( h ). Scale bar, 50 µm. i – m IB and quantification of protein levels analysis. Anti-Flag IP derived from 293 T cells transfected with HA-Src, GPR54-myc, and either DUSP18-Flag or DUSP18 (C104S)-Flag constructs after Kp-10 treatment for 20 min ( i ) and quantification of protein levels ( j , k ). WCL derived from WT and Dusp18 −/− BMMs treated with or without Kp-10 for 20 min ( l ) and quantification of protein levels ( m ). n , o WT and Dusp18 −/− BMMs were cultured in vitro on dentin slices, and after incubation with M-CSF (10 ng/ml) and RANKL (50 ng/ml) for 5–7 days, the pits formed by osteoclast absorption activity were scanned by confocal microscopy (XY and z sections). Scale bars, 125 µm ( n ), and pits depth were quantified by confocal microscopy ( o ). Data represent means ± SEM. P values were determined by one-way ANOVA analysis ( d , f , j , k , m , o ) or by two-tailed Student’s t -test ( h ). Representative results were obtained from at least three independent experiments. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: Kisspeptin-10 binding to Gpr54 in osteoclasts prevents bone loss by activating Dusp18-mediated dephosphorylation of Src

doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-44852-9

Figure Lengend Snippet: a The binding affinity of DUSP18 and Src was measured at 5.9 nM (RUmax = 130.6, Chi = 3.42) by SPR binding analysis. b – f IB and quantification of protein co-IP levels. Anti-Flag IP derived from 293 T cells transfected with HA-Src and either DUSP18-Flag or DUSP18 (C104S)-Flag constructs with or without Kp-10 treatment for 20 min were lysed and subjected to anti-FLAG IP ( b ). Phosphatase reaction products using His-DUSP18 and His-DUSP18 (C104S) proteins purified from E. coli and SRC proteins purified from Sf9 insect cells ( c ) and quantification of protein levels ( d ). Anti-Src IP derived from RAW264.7 cells treated with or without Kp-10 treatment for 20 min were lysed and subjected to anti-Src IP ( e ) and quantification of protein levels ( f ). g , h Src and Dusp18 co-localization was analyzed by IF staining in primary pre-osteoclasts treated with 10 nM Kp-10 treatment for 20 min. Representative images of endogenous Dusp18 and Src were shown by TIRF microscopy ( g ), and MOC was used to quantify the degree of colocalization in cells from multiple images taken randomly ( h ). Scale bar, 50 µm. i – m IB and quantification of protein levels analysis. Anti-Flag IP derived from 293 T cells transfected with HA-Src, GPR54-myc, and either DUSP18-Flag or DUSP18 (C104S)-Flag constructs after Kp-10 treatment for 20 min ( i ) and quantification of protein levels ( j , k ). WCL derived from WT and Dusp18 −/− BMMs treated with or without Kp-10 for 20 min ( l ) and quantification of protein levels ( m ). n , o WT and Dusp18 −/− BMMs were cultured in vitro on dentin slices, and after incubation with M-CSF (10 ng/ml) and RANKL (50 ng/ml) for 5–7 days, the pits formed by osteoclast absorption activity were scanned by confocal microscopy (XY and z sections). Scale bars, 125 µm ( n ), and pits depth were quantified by confocal microscopy ( o ). Data represent means ± SEM. P values were determined by one-way ANOVA analysis ( d , f , j , k , m , o ) or by two-tailed Student’s t -test ( h ). Representative results were obtained from at least three independent experiments. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Article Snippet: Fig. 4 Src was dephosphorylated via DUSP18 following GPR54 activation by Kp-10. a The binding affinity of DUSP18 and Src was measured at 5.9 nM (RUmax = 130.6, Chi = 3.42) by SPR binding analysis. b – f IB and quantification of protein co-IP levels.

Techniques: Binding Assay, Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay, Derivative Assay, Transfection, Construct, Purification, Staining, Microscopy, Cell Culture, In Vitro, Incubation, Activity Assay, Confocal Microscopy, Two Tailed Test